So I got your attention, now let’s see if I can keep it.
At the time of this writing, Google had far surpassed Yahoo! in terms of market value ($130 billion to $30 billion) but still trailed Microsoft ($284 billion). A tale of the tape suggests that MSFT merits the higher market cap: in 2005, MSFT generated net income of $12 billion off $39 billion in revenues; in 2006, it’s on pace to generate another $12 billion on increased revenues of $44 billion. As the numbers suggest, Microsoft is so large that it finds growth harder to come by. It is by no means a mature company in the utilities sense of the word, but indeed, some would say that MSFT has lost its way (click here for O Microsoft , Microsoft ! wherefore art thou Microsoft).
Google, on the other hand, is a much younger company and has been growing at a torrid pace:
Looking at its recent finances on the Google Investor page, you can see that revenue growth has fallen but remains impressive:
- 2002 revenues grew 409%
- 2003 revenues grew 234%
- 2004 revenues grew 118%
- 2005 revenues grew 92%
- 2006 look like they will be growing at least by 70%.
While Google is anything but mature, one can tell that its revenues are growing, but at a slower rate. We can estimate that its 2007 revenues can grow by 50%, 2008 revenues can grow by 40%, and thereafter, the company’s revenues will grow at some 30% annual clip.
Of course, YouTube’s notwithstanding, companies are judged by profits or income, not revenues.
Google is an interesting case in that it model is so systematic and automated, that its degree of financial and operating leverage are very high, you can note for example that this most recent quarter, its revenues grew 70% while its profits grew an astounding 92%.
Google has historically seen net income weigh in at 25% of revenues. As such, to estimate future profits, we will estimate that Google will maintain 25% profit margin. This assumes that the company will be reinvesting its mushrooming revenues in the company.
Projecting these growth rates onto the company’s historical performance and 2006’s pace, one can see that Google’s revenues will spiral to $34 billion in 2010. That is a very daunting task. What’s the first thing you’re taught in finance class? Historical performance does not guarantee future performance. So there is no guarantee that Google can maintain growth rates of 70%, 50%, 40% and 25% in 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010.
What’s more, Google currently makes 99.9% of its revenues from paid search. So this all assumes that paid search continues to grow. Of course, paid search is growing, as are other areas of online advertising. Just this past month, Morgan Stanley’s Mary Meeker came out and boasted that the US online ad market would be a $32 billion one by 2010, upping eMarketer’s $25 billion estimate. Mind you, both eMarketer and Mary Meeker have a lot to gain by pumping these numbers, that’s how the system works. And admittedly, I am certainly not drinking the Google koolaid and implying that Google will be making $32 billion in revenues by 2010 or that it will be worth more than Microsoft in 2010, I am trying to show that numbers can be played with. When I’m not writing on this site, I’m busy building a company where interested parties ask me to define the market we’re going after, formulate a valuation for our company and what not, I do it as a fun exercise but am the first one to show how laughable such models are… just as crazy as RBC’s Jordan Rohan to come out and say that MySpace could be worth $15 billion in a few years. The problem is that he’s paid to come up with such models, I’m not. Point is: if Myspace and its social sexual predators can be worth $15 billion, heck, why can’t Google be worth more than MSFT? I’ve argued that Google is well on its way to become the Standard Oil or MSFT-esque monopoly of the 21st Century.
Anyway, enough social commentary. Where were we? Right, Google is set to take over MSFT in terms of market cap by 2010.
Right now: Google is at $130 billion while MSFT is at $280 billion. That’s less than 4 years to increase by $150 billion. And yes, that assumes MSFT does not increase in value. Is that realistic.
Since peaking in 1999 at around US$119 (US$60.928 adjusting for splits), MSFT has gone down and traded within a frustrating range with no light at the end of the tunnel. Nonetheless, it has steadily increased revenues and profits. So we are making a simple assumption: we do not doubt that MSFT will increase revenues and or profits, but in light of the fact that the stock has been stuck in a rut for half a decade, we have no reason to suspect it will be higher in three years. We realize it’s an oversimplified basis for debate, but if you disagree, come up with your own model. Yes Jordan, that’s a challenge.
So this exercise is trying to assertain what kind of valuation we think Google could have in 2010. We said that given our projected growth in revenue, Google can make $34 billion by 2010. We know that the entire US online ad market is set to fetch $25 billion to $32 billion in America alone. It must be true since eMarketer and Morgan Stanley said so. Of course, the $34 billion Google revenue figure is for international sales, whereas the figures being brandied by eMarketer and Morgan Stanley are for the US alone.
In Google’s most recent quarter, it generated some 44% of its revenues from abroad, outside of the US. So assuming Google will in the long run generate some 50% of its revenues from outside of the US, that’s $17 billion from the US and $17 billion from non-US nations.
Is this realistic? Today, we see that Google commands a 50% market share of the queries conducted in the search engine industry. We’ve also seen Google command a whopping 25% of the total online US ad industry in terms of dollars. Add to these numbers the fact that paid search commands some 40% of the overall online market and the fact that over time, Google will hold higher market share in non search areas of online advertising and it is very plausible that if all of these macro level trends hold up, it is not inconceivable for Google to generate $17 billion in paid search, video, display, classified revenue in the US out of a total market of $32 billion (using Morgan Stanley’s figure).
Yes, that means that Google will command more than $1 out of every $2 of ad spending in the US in 2010. I personally think that this is not realistic, but if you simply look at Google’s growth rate, it would not be inconceivable for Google to generate that much. What is more likely (in the event Google were to maintain revenue growth rates and hit that lofty number) is that Google’s many investments in new markets finally pay off and other departments kick in revenue-wise.
More importantly, every time the eMarketers and company increase total ad estimates, it comes off the heels of Google’s homerun numbers. Fittingly, Google is the one micro factor that impacts macro trends.
So, if Google can generate some $34 billion by 2010, assuming it can maintain a 25% profit margin (which it has historically) then Google will make some $8.2 billion in profit by 2010.
Today, Google commands a price / earnings ratio of 55. A P/E is simply how much investors are willing to play for one dollar of earning; a P/E of 55 implies that Google’s growth rate (and everything else) is so impressive that Google are willing to pay $55 for the right to own that $1 of earning. Legendary investors Ben Graham and Warren Buffett would tell you to buy companies when P/Es hit 15 and sell them when they reach 30. Of course, neither men would invest in Google, though there has only been one sure-thing investment since Google’s IPO, and it ain’t MSFT.
Alas, today Google commands a P/E of 55, in 2007 we believe it will fetch a P/E greater or equal to 50, in 2008 that might fall to 45, in 2009 it will further fall to 40 and in 2010 the famous P/E might be in the 35 range. At that time, Google will be 15 years old. Not that age is everything, but MSFT is 30 today and commands a P/E of about 25 (according to Yahoo! Finance); Yahoo! is 10 years old now and commands a P/E of 27 (again taken from Yahoo! Finance).
So in 2010, Google’s current historical growth rate projects a revenue figure of $34 billion, with 25% profit margin of $8.2 billion, and with a P/E of 35, could technically command an enterprise value of $287 billion. It currently boasts some $10 billion, so at these levels, it would carry enough cash to push up its market cap northwards of $300 billion.
Today, MSFT has a market cap of $284 billion, and that includes a wallop of cash.
Tale of the tape: Google $287 billion; MSFT $284 billion…
There you have it. Told you it’s not a bubble, we’re actually talking revenues, profits and P/E.
Subscribe:
October 23rd, 2006 at 4:35 pm
Interesting commentary, and I appreciate your analysis.
However, when you write: “More importantly, every time the eMarketers and company increase total ad estimates, it comes off the heels of Google’s homerun numbers.”
In fact, eMarketer’s US Internet ad estimates for 2006 through 2010 were lowered in September, not raised…based on several factors, not just Google and Yahoo.
We look to be objective, not boosters, but remain imperfect.
I enjoy your site. Thanks,
David
eMarketer Senior Analyst
October 25th, 2006 at 7:07 pm
[…] - Google Base - its competition for Craigslist and eBay; which has all but disappeared from the radar. - GMail - it’s a great service which I use exclusively, but it has failed to catch on as some would have expected. Why is that? - Froogle - comparison shopping and Amazon.com “killer” which has done little to affect the leaders in the space. - Integration of YouTube and Google Video (although what I would recommend to do is pretty radical compared to what they will probably do here…) - Documents and Spreadsheets - this could really hurt MSFT and should be high priority on Google’s list if they want to catch up to MSFT’s market cap. […]
October 25th, 2006 at 9:26 pm
[…] Google To Boast Larger Market Capitalization than Microsoft in 2010 This is an interesting and believable take on Google assault on the sloth-like Microsoft (tags: GOOG MSFT Google Microsoft) […]
October 26th, 2006 at 9:46 am
[…] From Vinny Lingham’s Blog: Google To Boast Larger Market Capitalization than Microsoft in 2010 posted by froosh So I got your attention, now let’s see if I can keep it.At the time of this writing, Google had far surpassed Yahoo! in terms of market value ($130 billion to $30 billion) but still trailed Microsoft ($284 billion). A tale of the tape suggests that MSFT merits the higher market cap: in 2005, MSFT generated net income of $12 billion off $39 billion in revenues; in 2006, it’s on pace to generate another $12 billion on increased revenues of $44 billion. As the numbers suggest, Microsoft is so large that it finds growth harder to come by. It is by no means a mature company in the utilities sense of the word, but indeed, some would say that MSFT has lost its way (click here for O Microsoft , Microsoft ! wherefore art thou Microsoft). […]
October 26th, 2006 at 5:23 pm
[…] - when Google could surpass Microsoft in market captalization here; - what Google could generate from YouTube by adding Ad Sense on the social networking video site here; - what YouTube’s pre-Google acquisition revenues could be here; - what MySpace’s search business was worth to a partner here. […]
October 30th, 2006 at 1:47 pm
[…] Yes, Google is growing faster and could even go on to overtake Microsoft in terms of market valuation, but those are two technology companies and trade as such. […]
October 31st, 2006 at 8:55 am
forward PE for msft is just 20 and it reaches that in July 2007. G might get to 288 in 2010, but msft should be well ahead of those numbers…
November 5th, 2006 at 9:53 pm
[…] We all know that search is a high-growth industry. The problem is that it’s a wildly lucrative space for players who have been around for a while. Google owns 50% of the market and as a result books $1 out of every $4 spent on advertising in the US in 2006. If estimates for total online advertising in the US are to grow to $25 or $32 billion, and search represents 40% of the market, then search will be a $12 billion market. This is why we think that ceteris paribus, Google could overtake Microsoft in market cap by then. But, again, this is not so much about Google or Microsoft, but rather, Answers.com. […]
November 6th, 2006 at 4:01 pm
[…] Pueden leer el articulo completo aqui. […]
November 7th, 2006 at 2:21 am
[…] Pode até ser inevitável que a Google ultrapasse a Microsoft em termos de capitalização em 2010, mas volto a chamar atenção para o fato de que o pessoal em Redmond tem estado bastante ativo, e criado muita coisa interessante nas últimas semanas. Como o Virtual Earth, por exemplo (infelizmente, meu computador atual não chega nem perto de poder testar o bichinho). […]
November 7th, 2006 at 5:45 pm
[…] All to say, I knew I had to dig deeper. You will have to forgive me for not being very familiar with PopSugar.com, after all, I am certainly not in their target market. Given the pedigree of the VC in question, I had to dig deeper, but between analyzing the value of Wikipedia.org were it to be a for-profit, estimating when Google could overtake Microsoft in market value and managing the Mojo Supreme network of sites, investigating the “PopSugar rationale” kept falling on the backburner. […]
November 11th, 2006 at 10:38 pm
[…] And in terms of Google’s revenue, we’ve covered it here. It might take a small hit, but long term, Google will be generating more not less revenue. That does not mean it’s market cap will also rise though, since P/E and P/S multiples might slide for Google. Though we think that unless MSFT shakes things up and the overall web space does not cool off, Google has a shot of overtaking MSFT in market cap. Of course, MSFT looks to have its Mojo back. I sold my MSFT shares last month after a nice run-up. […]
November 13th, 2006 at 8:48 am
[…] Who knows, maybe “this time really will be different,” and I “don’t get it.” Or, maybe in an ironic twist, Dogster will file for an IPO instead of being acquired by someone (or shutting down), grow to take over MSFT in market cap and acquire Google (and I own a dog and cat). November 13th 2006 Posted to Uncategorized, Startups, Management, Investing […]
November 14th, 2006 at 11:47 am
[…] But, when you’re also a writer of a website that questions what Wikipedia should be worth as a for-profit, if Google can overtake MSFT in market cap, whether Google overpaid for News Corp.’s search business or if it’s the 21st century version of Standard Oil or Microsoft, you can’t help but ask the question: […]
January 26th, 2009 at 10:31 am
[…] shuttering of unrelated businesses, Google remains as ambitious as ever to replace Microsoft as the most valuable technology company and become the 21st century’s version of Standard Oil. The Google Drive, or […]